1999 Chevrolet Malibu vs. 2010 Proton Gen-2
To start off, 2010 Proton Gen-2 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chevrolet Malibu. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chevrolet Malibu would be higher. At 2,392 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Malibu is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Malibu (150 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 42 more horse power than 2010 Proton Gen-2. (108 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Malibu should accelerate faster than 2010 Proton Gen-2.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chevrolet Malibu (210 Nm @ 4400 RPM) has 62 more torque (in Nm) than 2010 Proton Gen-2. (148 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1999 Chevrolet Malibu will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2010 Proton Gen-2.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Chevrolet Malibu | 2010 Proton Gen-2 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Proton |
| Model | Malibu | Gen-2 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
| Engine Size | 2392 cc | 1597 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 150 HP | 108 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 210 Nm | 148 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4400 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4850 mm | 4320 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1730 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1440 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2610 mm |
