1999 Chevrolet Metro vs. 1960 Ferrari 256 F1
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Metro is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Ferrari 256 F1. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 would be higher. At 2,474 cc (6 cylinders), 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 (292 HP @ 8600 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 1999 Chevrolet Metro. (53 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 should accelerate faster than 1999 Chevrolet Metro. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chevrolet Metro weights approximately 340 kg more than 1960 Ferrari 256 F1.
Because 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Ferrari 256 F1. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Metro | 1960 Ferrari 256 F1 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ferrari |
Model | Metro | 256 F1 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 2474 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 292 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 8600 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 560 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4040 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 990 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2230 mm |