1999 Chevrolet Metro vs. 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Metro is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass would be higher. At 2,260 cc (4 cylinders), 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass weights approximately 426 kg more than 1999 Chevrolet Metro.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Chevrolet Metro | 1986 Oldsmobile Cutlass | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Oldsmobile |
| Model | Metro | Cutlass |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1986 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 999 cc | 2260 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 53 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Number of Seats | 4 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Weight | 900 kg | 1326 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4850 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1780 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2680 mm |
