1999 Chevrolet Metro vs. 2000 Ford ST 460
To start off, 2000 Ford ST 460 is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chevrolet Metro. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chevrolet Metro would be higher. At 4,600 cc (8 cylinders), 2000 Ford ST 460 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2000 Ford ST 460 (460 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 407 more horse power than 1999 Chevrolet Metro. (53 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2000 Ford ST 460 should accelerate faster than 1999 Chevrolet Metro.
Because 2000 Ford ST 460 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2000 Ford ST 460. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Metro, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2000 Ford ST 460 (178 Nm) has 99 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Chevrolet Metro. (79 Nm). This means 2000 Ford ST 460 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Chevrolet Metro.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Metro | 2000 Ford ST 460 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Metro | ST 460 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2000 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 999 cc | 4600 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 53 HP | 460 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 79 Nm | 178 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 4 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2370 mm | 2580 mm |