1999 Chevrolet S-10 vs. 2013 Smart Fortwo
To start off, 2013 Smart Fortwo is newer by 14 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chevrolet S-10. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chevrolet S-10 would be higher.
Because 1999 Chevrolet S-10 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2013 Smart Fortwo. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet S-10 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chevrolet S-10 (190 Nm) has 60 more torque (in Nm) than 2013 Smart Fortwo. (130 Nm). This means 1999 Chevrolet S-10 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2013 Smart Fortwo. 2013 Smart Fortwo has automatic transmission and 1999 Chevrolet S-10 has manual transmission. 1999 Chevrolet S-10 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2013 Smart Fortwo will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Chevrolet S-10 | 2013 Smart Fortwo | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Smart |
| Model | S-10 | Fortwo |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2013 |
| Body Type | Pickup | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Type | in-line | electric |
| Horse Power | 118 HP | 0 HP |
| Torque | 190 Nm | 130 Nm |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Electric |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | 5-speed automatic |
| Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1559 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1600 mm | 1542 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3130 mm | 1867 mm |
