1999 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1954 Jeep CJ
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1954 Jeep CJ. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1954 Jeep CJ would be higher. At 3,151 cc (4 cylinders), 1954 Jeep CJ is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 1954 Jeep CJ. (62 HP @ 3000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1954 Jeep CJ.
Because 1954 Jeep CJ is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1954 Jeep CJ will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1954 Jeep CJ (179 Nm @ 1350 RPM) has 40 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1954 Jeep CJ will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Tracker | 1954 Jeep CJ | |
Make | Chevrolet | Jeep |
Model | Tracker | CJ |
Year Released | 1999 | 1954 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 3151 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 62 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 179 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1350 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3520 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1740 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2060 mm |