1999 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1955 DKW Universal
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 DKW Universal. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 DKW Universal would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine.
Because 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1955 DKW Universal, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Chevrolet Tracker | 1955 DKW Universal | |
| Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
| Model | Tracker | Universal |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1955 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 896 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4130 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1530 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2460 mm |
