1999 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1957 Ford 12 M
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 42 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1957 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1957 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1957 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1957 Ford 12 M.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Tracker | 1957 Ford 12 M | |
Make | Chevrolet | Ford |
Model | Tracker | 12 M |
Year Released | 1999 | 1957 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 37 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1590 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2500 mm |