1999 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1960 Lotus Elite
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 26 more horse power than 1960 Lotus Elite. (71 HP @ 6100 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1960 Lotus Elite.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 35 more torque (in Nm) than 1960 Lotus Elite. (104 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1999 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1960 Lotus Elite.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Tracker | 1960 Lotus Elite | |
Make | Chevrolet | Lotus |
Model | Tracker | Elite |
Year Released | 1999 | 1960 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1216 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 71 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 6100 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 104 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3750 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1510 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1200 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2240 mm |