1999 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1962 Skoda 1202
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Skoda 1202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Skoda 1202 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 1962 Skoda 1202. (44 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1962 Skoda 1202.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 52 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Skoda 1202. (87 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 1999 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Skoda 1202.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Chevrolet Tracker | 1962 Skoda 1202 | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Skoda |
| Model | Tracker | 1202 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1590 cc | 1221 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 97 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 139 Nm | 87 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2690 mm |
