1999 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1963 DKW F 11
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW F 11. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW F 11 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 59 more horse power than 1963 DKW F 11. (38 HP @ 4300 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW F 11.
Because 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW F 11, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Tracker | 1963 DKW F 11 | |
Make | Chevrolet | DKW |
Model | Tracker | F 11 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 889 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 4300 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 2250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 3970 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1580 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2260 mm |