1999 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1973 Renault 5

To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 26 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1973 Renault 5. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1973 Renault 5 would be higher. At 1,590 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 64 more horse power than 1973 Renault 5. (33 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1973 Renault 5.

Because 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1973 Renault 5, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 86 more torque (in Nm) than 1973 Renault 5. (53 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1999 Chevrolet Tracker will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1973 Renault 5.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Chevrolet Tracker 1973 Renault 5
Make Chevrolet Renault
Model Tracker 5
Year Released 1999 1973
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1590 cc 782 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 97 HP 33 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5200 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 53 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 3000 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Vehicle Length 4140 mm 3530 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1530 mm
Vehicle Height 1690 mm 1410 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2410 mm