1999 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1984 Dodge 600
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 15 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1984 Dodge 600. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1984 Dodge 600 would be higher. At 2,213 cc (4 cylinders), 1984 Dodge 600 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 1 more horse power than 1984 Dodge 600. (96 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker should accelerate faster than 1984 Dodge 600.
Because 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1984 Dodge 600, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1984 Dodge 600 (158 Nm @ 3200 RPM) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 1984 Dodge 600 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Tracker | 1984 Dodge 600 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Dodge |
Model | Tracker | 600 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1984 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 2213 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 96 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 139 Nm | 158 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4760 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2630 mm |