1999 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 1996 Marcos Mantis
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Marcos Mantis. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Marcos Mantis would be higher. At 4,601 cc (8 cylinders), 1996 Marcos Mantis is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1996 Marcos Mantis (352 HP) has 255 more horse power than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1996 Marcos Mantis should accelerate faster than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1996 Marcos Mantis (407 Nm) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm). This means 1996 Marcos Mantis will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Tracker | 1996 Marcos Mantis | |
Make | Chevrolet | Marcos |
Model | Tracker | Mantis |
Year Released | 1999 | 1996 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 4601 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 352 HP |
Torque | 139 Nm | 407 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1020 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2290 mm |