1999 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2004 Ford Galaxy

To start off, 2004 Ford Galaxy is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 2004 Ford Galaxy is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford Galaxy (115 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford Galaxy should accelerate faster than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker.

Because 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Ford Galaxy, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford Galaxy (180 Nm @ 2300 RPM) has 41 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Ford Galaxy will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Chevrolet Tracker 2004 Ford Galaxy
Make Chevrolet Ford
Model Tracker Galaxy
Year Released 1999 2004
Body Type SUV Minivan
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1590 cc 1997 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 97 HP 115 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5500 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 180 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 2300 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline - Premium
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Vehicle Length 4140 mm 4650 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1820 mm
Vehicle Height 1690 mm 1800 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2840 mm