1999 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2004 Volvo XC90
To start off, 2004 Volvo XC90 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,901 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Volvo XC90 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Volvo XC90 (268 HP) has 171 more horse power than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 should accelerate faster than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker.
Because 2004 Volvo XC90 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2004 Volvo XC90 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2004 Volvo XC90 (380 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 241 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2004 Volvo XC90 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chevrolet Tracker | 2004 Volvo XC90 | |
Make | Chevrolet | Volvo |
Model | Tracker | XC90 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2004 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1590 cc | 2901 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 97 HP | 268 HP |
Torque | 139 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 1800 RPM |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4140 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1720 mm | 1900 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1690 mm | 1790 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2210 mm | 2870 mm |