1999 Chevrolet Tracker vs. 2010 Volvo C30

To start off, 2010 Volvo C30 is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chevrolet Tracker would be higher. At 2,500 cc (5 cylinders), 2010 Volvo C30 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Volvo C30 (227 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 130 more horse power than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. (97 HP @ 5200 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30 should accelerate faster than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker.

Because 1999 Chevrolet Tracker is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2010 Volvo C30, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Volvo C30 (320 Nm @ 1500 RPM) has 181 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker. (139 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2010 Volvo C30 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Chevrolet Tracker.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Chevrolet Tracker 2010 Volvo C30
Make Chevrolet Volvo
Model Tracker C30
Year Released 1999 2010
Body Type SUV Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1590 cc 2500 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 5 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 97 HP 227 HP
Engine RPM 5200 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 139 Nm 320 Nm
Torque RPM 4000 RPM 1500 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 4 seats
Vehicle Length 4140 mm 4265 mm
Vehicle Width 1720 mm 1783 mm
Vehicle Height 1690 mm 1448 mm
Wheelbase Size 2210 mm 2639 mm