1999 Chevrolet Trans Sport vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1999 Chevrolet Trans Sport is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 3,350 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Chevrolet Trans Sport is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chevrolet Trans Sport (183 HP) has 143 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Trans Sport should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chevrolet Trans Sport weights approximately 540 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1960 Toyota Master RR is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Toyota Master RR. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Chevrolet Trans Sport, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Chevrolet Trans Sport | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
| Make | Chevrolet | Toyota |
| Model | Trans Sport | Master RR |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1960 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3350 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 183 HP | 40 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1750 kg | 1210 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5120 mm | 4280 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1850 mm | 1680 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1810 mm | 1560 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3050 mm | 2540 mm |
