1999 Chrysler Cirrus vs. 2003 Pontiac Bonneville
To start off, 2003 Pontiac Bonneville is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chrysler Cirrus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chrysler Cirrus would be higher. At 4,565 cc (8 cylinders), 2003 Pontiac Bonneville is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2003 Pontiac Bonneville (275 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 107 more horse power than 1999 Chrysler Cirrus. (168 HP @ 5800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2003 Pontiac Bonneville should accelerate faster than 1999 Chrysler Cirrus. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2003 Pontiac Bonneville weights approximately 292 kg more than 1999 Chrysler Cirrus. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2003 Pontiac Bonneville (298 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 68 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Chrysler Cirrus. (230 Nm @ 4350 RPM). This means 2003 Pontiac Bonneville will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Chrysler Cirrus.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Chrysler Cirrus | 2003 Pontiac Bonneville | |
| Make | Chrysler | Pontiac |
| Model | Cirrus | Bonneville |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2003 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 4565 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 275 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 5600 RPM |
| Torque | 230 Nm | 298 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4350 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.6 mm | 93.1 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 84 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1427 kg | 1719 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 5150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1890 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1440 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2790 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 70 L |
