1999 Chrysler Cirrus vs. 2006 Toyota Matrix
To start off, 2006 Toyota Matrix is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chrysler Cirrus. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chrysler Cirrus would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Chrysler Cirrus is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chrysler Cirrus (168 HP @ 5800 RPM) has 50 more horse power than 2006 Toyota Matrix. (118 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chrysler Cirrus should accelerate faster than 2006 Toyota Matrix. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chrysler Cirrus weights approximately 57 kg more than 2006 Toyota Matrix. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2006 Toyota Matrix is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1999 Chrysler Cirrus. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2006 Toyota Matrix will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chrysler Cirrus (230 Nm @ 4350 RPM) has 74 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Toyota Matrix. (156 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 1999 Chrysler Cirrus will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Toyota Matrix.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Chrysler Cirrus | 2006 Toyota Matrix | |
| Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
| Model | Cirrus | Matrix |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Sedan | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1784 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
| Horse Power | 168 HP | 118 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5800 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Torque | 230 Nm | 156 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4350 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 83.6 mm | 79 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 76 mm | 91.5 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 9.4:1 | 10.0:1 |
| Drive Type | Front | 4WD |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 4 doors | 5 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1427 kg | 1370 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4760 mm | 4360 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1830 mm | 1780 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1570 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2610 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 45 L |
