1999 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1964 Zastava 1500

To start off, 1999 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 35 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 Zastava 1500. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 Zastava 1500 would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chrysler Concorde (190 HP) has 137 more horse power than 1964 Zastava 1500. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chrysler Concorde should accelerate faster than 1964 Zastava 1500. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 591 kg more than 1964 Zastava 1500. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1964 Zastava 1500 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1964 Zastava 1500. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chrysler Concorde (259 Nm @ 4850 RPM) has 166 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 Zastava 1500. (93 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1999 Chrysler Concorde will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 Zastava 1500. 1999 Chrysler Concorde has automatic transmission and 1964 Zastava 1500 has manual transmission. 1964 Zastava 1500 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Chrysler Concorde will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: