1999 Chrysler Concorde vs. 1965 Triumph 2000

To start off, 1999 Chrysler Concorde is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chrysler Concorde (190 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 101 more horse power than 1965 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chrysler Concorde should accelerate faster than 1965 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chrysler Concorde weights approximately 405 kg more than 1965 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chrysler Concorde (259 Nm @ 4850 RPM) has 101 more torque (in Nm) than 1965 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1999 Chrysler Concorde will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1965 Triumph 2000.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Chrysler Concorde 1965 Triumph 2000
Make Chrysler Triumph
Model Concorde 2000
Year Released 1999 1965
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2737 cc 1997 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 4 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 190 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 5700 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 259 Nm 158 Nm
Torque RPM 4850 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 86 mm 74.7 mm
Engine Stroke Size 78.5 mm 76 mm
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 4 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1575 kg 1170 kg
Vehicle Length 5280 mm 4420 mm
Vehicle Width 1900 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1420 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2880 mm 2700 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 68 L 64 L