1999 Chrysler Concorde vs. 2011 Holden Commodore

To start off, 2011 Holden Commodore is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chrysler Concorde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chrysler Concorde would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2011 Holden Commodore (240 HP) has 50 more horse power than 1999 Chrysler Concorde. (190 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2011 Holden Commodore should accelerate faster than 1999 Chrysler Concorde.

Because 2011 Holden Commodore is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Holden Commodore. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Chrysler Concorde, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chrysler Concorde (259 Nm) has 19 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 1999 Chrysler Concorde will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Commodore. 1999 Chrysler Concorde has automatic transmission and 2011 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2011 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Chrysler Concorde will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: