1999 Chrysler Concorde vs. 2012 Volvo C70
To start off, 2012 Volvo C70 is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chrysler Concorde. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chrysler Concorde would be higher. At 2,737 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Chrysler Concorde is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2012 Volvo C70 weights approximately 165 kg more than 1999 Chrysler Concorde.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Volvo C70 (350 Nm) has 91 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Chrysler Concorde. (259 Nm). This means 2012 Volvo C70 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Chrysler Concorde.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chrysler Concorde | 2012 Volvo C70 | |
Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
Model | Concorde | C70 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Body Type | Sedan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2737 cc | 2400 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 5 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 190 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 259 Nm | 350 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 5-speed shiftable automatic |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 4 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1575 kg | 1740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5280 mm | 4582 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1900 mm | 1836 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1420 mm | 1400 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2880 mm | 2639 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 68 L | 60 L |