1999 Chrysler Java vs. 1995 Rover 200
To start off, 1999 Chrysler Java is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Rover 200. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Rover 200 would be higher. At 1,994 cc (4 cylinders), 1995 Rover 200 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Rover 200 (140 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 1999 Chrysler Java. (80 HP @ 5000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Rover 200 should accelerate faster than 1999 Chrysler Java. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chrysler Java weights approximately 394 kg more than 1995 Rover 200.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Rover 200 (185 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 55 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Chrysler Java. (130 Nm @ 3750 RPM). This means 1995 Rover 200 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Chrysler Java.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chrysler Java | 1995 Rover 200 | |
Make | Chrysler | Rover |
Model | Java | 200 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1995 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1400 cc | 1994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 140 HP |
Engine RPM | 5000 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 130 Nm | 185 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3750 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Weight | 1600 kg | 1206 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2510 mm |