1999 Chrysler Java vs. 2010 Holden Colorado
To start off, 2010 Holden Colorado is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chrysler Java. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chrysler Java would be higher. At 3,000 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Colorado is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Colorado (161 HP) has 81 more horse power than 1999 Chrysler Java. (80 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Colorado should accelerate faster than 1999 Chrysler Java.
Because 2010 Holden Colorado is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2010 Holden Colorado. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Chrysler Java, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Colorado (360 Nm) has 230 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Chrysler Java. (130 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Colorado will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Chrysler Java.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chrysler Java | 2010 Holden Colorado | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Java | Colorado |
Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1400 cc | 3000 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 161 HP |
Torque | 130 Nm | 360 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |