1999 Chrysler Java vs. 2010 Holden Epica
To start off, 2010 Holden Epica is newer by 11 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chrysler Java. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chrysler Java would be higher. At 1,991 cc (4 cylinders), 2010 Holden Epica is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2010 Holden Epica (148 HP) has 68 more horse power than 1999 Chrysler Java. (80 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2010 Holden Epica should accelerate faster than 1999 Chrysler Java.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2010 Holden Epica (320 Nm) has 190 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Chrysler Java. (130 Nm). This means 2010 Holden Epica will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Chrysler Java.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chrysler Java | 2010 Holden Epica | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Java | Epica |
Year Released | 1999 | 2010 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1400 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 80 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 130 Nm | 320 Nm |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 3770 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1730 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1580 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2490 mm | 2700 mm |