1999 Chrysler Viper vs. 1960 Toyota Master RR
To start off, 1999 Chrysler Viper is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Toyota Master RR. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Toyota Master RR would be higher. At 7,986 cc (10 cylinders), 1999 Chrysler Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chrysler Viper (389 HP) has 349 more horse power than 1960 Toyota Master RR. (40 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chrysler Viper should accelerate faster than 1960 Toyota Master RR. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chrysler Viper weights approximately 380 kg more than 1960 Toyota Master RR. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chrysler Viper | 1960 Toyota Master RR | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | Viper | Master RR |
Year Released | 1999 | 1960 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7986 cc | 1453 cc |
Horse Power | 389 HP | 40 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1210 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4280 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2540 mm |