1999 Chrysler Viper vs. 1967 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1999 Chrysler Viper is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 7,986 cc (10 cylinders), 1999 Chrysler Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chrysler Viper (389 HP @ 5150 RPM) has 172 more horse power than 1967 Ford Mustang. (217 HP @ 4800 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chrysler Viper should accelerate faster than 1967 Ford Mustang. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Chrysler Viper weights approximately 425 kg more than 1967 Ford Mustang. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chrysler Viper | 1967 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Viper | Mustang |
Year Released | 1999 | 1967 |
Body Type | Roadster | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7986 cc | 4733 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 389 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5150 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2750 mm |