1999 Chrysler Viper vs. 2012 Holden Epica
To start off, 2012 Holden Epica is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Chrysler Viper. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Chrysler Viper would be higher. At 7,986 cc (10 cylinders), 1999 Chrysler Viper is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Chrysler Viper (389 HP) has 241 more horse power than 2012 Holden Epica. (148 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Chrysler Viper should accelerate faster than 2012 Holden Epica.
Because 1999 Chrysler Viper is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1999 Chrysler Viper. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2012 Holden Epica, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Chrysler Viper (620 Nm) has 300 more torque (in Nm) than 2012 Holden Epica. (320 Nm). This means 1999 Chrysler Viper will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2012 Holden Epica.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Chrysler Viper | 2012 Holden Epica | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Viper | Epica |
Year Released | 1999 | 2012 |
Body Type | Roadster | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 7986 cc | 1991 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 10 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 389 HP | 148 HP |
Torque | 620 Nm | 320 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Diesel |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4460 mm | 4805 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1930 mm | 1810 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1130 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2700 mm |