1999 Citroen C3 vs. 1947 Volvo PV 60
To start off, 1999 Citroen C3 is newer by 52 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1947 Volvo PV 60. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1947 Volvo PV 60 would be higher. At 3,670 cc (6 cylinders), 1947 Volvo PV 60 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Citroen C3 (90 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 5 more horse power than 1947 Volvo PV 60. (85 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1947 Volvo PV 60. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1947 Volvo PV 60 weights approximately 466 kg more than 1999 Citroen C3.
Because 1947 Volvo PV 60 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1947 Volvo PV 60. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Citroen C3 has automatic transmission and 1947 Volvo PV 60 has manual transmission. 1947 Volvo PV 60 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Citroen C3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Citroen C3 | 1947 Volvo PV 60 | |
Make | Citroen | Volvo |
Model | C3 | PV 60 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1947 |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 3670 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 85 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1164 kg | 1630 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2850 mm |