1999 Citroen C3 vs. 1968 Ford Mustang
To start off, 1999 Citroen C3 is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Ford Mustang. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Ford Mustang would be higher. At 4,733 cc (8 cylinders), 1968 Ford Mustang is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Ford Mustang (217 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1999 Citroen C3. (90 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Ford Mustang should accelerate faster than 1999 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Ford Mustang weights approximately 1 kg more than 1999 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Ford Mustang is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Ford Mustang. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Citroen C3 | 1968 Ford Mustang | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | C3 | Mustang |
Year Released | 1999 | 1968 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 4733 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 217 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1164 kg | 1165 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 4620 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1740 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2750 mm |