1999 Citroen C3 vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1999 Citroen C3 is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Citroen C3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Citroen C3 (90 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 23 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (67 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Citroen C3 weights approximately 390 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 1999 Citroen C3 has automatic transmission and 1981 Zastava 102 has manual transmission. 1981 Zastava 102 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Citroen C3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Citroen C3 | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
Make | Citroen | Zastava |
Model | C3 | 102 |
Year Released | 1999 | 1981 |
Engine Size | 1587 cc | 1302 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 90 HP | 67 HP |
Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1164 kg | 774 kg |
Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 3500 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1550 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2160 mm |