1999 Citroen C3 vs. 2009 Tata Nano
To start off, 2009 Tata Nano is newer by 10 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 1,587 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Citroen C3 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Citroen C3 (90 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 55 more horse power than 2009 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Citroen C3 should accelerate faster than 2009 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Citroen C3 weights approximately 564 kg more than 2009 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Citroen C3, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Citroen C3 (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 87 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1999 Citroen C3 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Tata Nano. 1999 Citroen C3 has automatic transmission and 2009 Tata Nano has manual transmission. 2009 Tata Nano will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Citroen C3 will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Citroen C3 | 2009 Tata Nano | |
| Make | Citroen | Tata |
| Model | C3 | Nano |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2009 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Hatchback |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 1587 cc | 624 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 35 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 48 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 78.5 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 82 mm | 73.5 mm |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1164 kg | 600 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3680 mm | 3099 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1740 mm | 1495 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1630 mm | 1652 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2450 mm | 2230 mm |
