1999 Citroen Saxo vs. 1997 Mazda Midge
To start off, 1999 Citroen Saxo is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Mazda Midge. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Mazda Midge would be higher. At 1,322 cc (4 cylinders), 1997 Mazda Midge is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1997 Mazda Midge (67 HP) has 18 more horse power than 1999 Citroen Saxo. (49 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1997 Mazda Midge should accelerate faster than 1999 Citroen Saxo. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1997 Mazda Midge weights approximately 161 kg more than 1999 Citroen Saxo. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1997 Mazda Midge (101 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 27 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Citroen Saxo. (74 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 1997 Mazda Midge will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Citroen Saxo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Citroen Saxo | 1997 Mazda Midge | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | Saxo | Midge |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1997 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 954 cc | 1322 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 49 HP | 67 HP |
| Torque | 74 Nm | 101 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3700 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Front |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 805 kg | 966 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3730 mm | 4000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1600 mm | 1650 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1390 mm | 1400 mm |
