1999 Citroen Xantia vs. 1982 Zastava 102
To start off, 1999 Citroen Xantia is newer by 17 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,995 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Citroen Xantia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Citroen Xantia (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1982 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Citroen Xantia should accelerate faster than 1982 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Citroen Xantia weights approximately 520 kg more than 1982 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Citroen Xantia (214 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 119 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Zastava 102. (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1999 Citroen Xantia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Zastava 102.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Citroen Xantia | 1982 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Citroen | Zastava |
| Model | Xantia | 102 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1982 |
| Engine Size | 1995 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 89 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 214 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1900 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1290 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2160 mm |
