1999 Citroen Xantia vs. 2011 Tata Nano
To start off, 2011 Tata Nano is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Citroen Xantia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Citroen Xantia would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Citroen Xantia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Citroen Xantia (87 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 52 more horse power than 2011 Tata Nano. (35 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Citroen Xantia should accelerate faster than 2011 Tata Nano. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Citroen Xantia weights approximately 736 kg more than 2011 Tata Nano. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2011 Tata Nano is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2011 Tata Nano. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Citroen Xantia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Citroen Xantia (200 Nm @ 2250 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Tata Nano. (48 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 1999 Citroen Xantia will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Tata Nano. 1999 Citroen Xantia has automatic transmission and 2011 Tata Nano has manual transmission. 2011 Tata Nano will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 1999 Citroen Xantia will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Citroen Xantia | 2011 Tata Nano | |
Make | Citroen | Tata |
Model | Xantia | Nano |
Year Released | 1999 | 2011 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 624 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 2 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 87 HP | 35 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque | 200 Nm | 48 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2250 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 73.5 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.5:1 | 9.5:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1336 kg | 600 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4450 mm | 3099 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1495 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 1652 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2750 mm | 2230 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 54 L | 37 L |