1999 Citroen XM vs. 1968 Pontiac Firebird
To start off, 1999 Citroen XM is newer by 31 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Pontiac Firebird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Pontiac Firebird would be higher. At 4,100 cc (6 cylinders), 1968 Pontiac Firebird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1968 Pontiac Firebird (175 HP) has 60 more horse power than 1999 Citroen XM. (115 HP) In normal driving conditions, 1968 Pontiac Firebird should accelerate faster than 1999 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1968 Pontiac Firebird weights approximately 380 kg more than 1999 Citroen XM. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1968 Pontiac Firebird is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1968 Pontiac Firebird. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Citroen XM, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Citroen XM | 1968 Pontiac Firebird | |
Make | Citroen | Pontiac |
Model | XM | Firebird |
Year Released | 1999 | 1968 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1996 cc | 4100 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 115 HP | 175 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1280 kg | 1660 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4720 mm | 4800 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1800 mm | 1850 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1400 mm | 1310 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2760 mm | 2750 mm |