1999 Citroen XM vs. 1995 Mazda 626

To start off, 1999 Citroen XM is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1995 Mazda 626. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1995 Mazda 626 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (6 cylinders), 1995 Mazda 626 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1995 Mazda 626 (161 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 46 more horse power than 1999 Citroen XM. (115 HP @ 5750 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1995 Mazda 626 should accelerate faster than 1999 Citroen XM. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Citroen XM weights approximately 14 kg more than 1995 Mazda 626.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1995 Mazda 626 (217 Nm @ 4800 RPM) has 43 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Citroen XM. (174 Nm @ 4250 RPM). This means 1995 Mazda 626 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Citroen XM.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Citroen XM 1995 Mazda 626
Make Citroen Mazda
Model XM 626
Year Released 1999 1995
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1996 cc 2497 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 115 HP 161 HP
Engine RPM 5750 RPM 5600 RPM
Torque 174 Nm 217 Nm
Torque RPM 4250 RPM 4800 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline Gasoline
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1280 kg 1266 kg
Vehicle Length 4720 mm 4700 mm
Vehicle Width 1800 mm 1760 mm
Vehicle Height 1400 mm 1400 mm
Wheelbase Size 2760 mm 2620 mm