1999 Citroen Xsara vs. 1963 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 1999 Citroen Xsara is newer by 36 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 1,868 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Citroen Xsara (70 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 10 more horse power than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1963 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 25 kg more than 1963 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Citroen Xsara (128 Nm @ 2500 RPM) has 13 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 1999 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Citroen Xsara | 1963 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Citroen | Nissan |
Model | Xsara | Cedric |
Year Released | 1999 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1868 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 70 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 4600 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 128 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2500 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1110 kg | 1085 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4360 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1430 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2550 mm | 2540 mm |