1999 Citroen Xsara vs. 1967 Mazda Cosmo
To start off, 1999 Citroen Xsara is newer by 32 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1967 Mazda Cosmo. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1967 Mazda Cosmo would be higher. At 1,964 cc, 1967 Mazda Cosmo is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1967 Mazda Cosmo (93 HP @ 7000 RPM) has 3 more horse power than 1999 Citroen Xsara. (90 HP @ 5600 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1967 Mazda Cosmo should accelerate faster than 1999 Citroen Xsara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 300 kg more than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Let's talk about torque, 1999 Citroen Xsara (135 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 2 more torque (in Nm) than 1967 Mazda Cosmo. (133 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1999 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1967 Mazda Cosmo.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Citroen Xsara | 1967 Mazda Cosmo | |
| Make | Citroen | Mazda |
| Model | Xsara | Cosmo |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1967 |
| Body Type | Hatchback | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1527 cc | 1964 cc |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 93 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 7000 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 133 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3500 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 940 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 4150 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1600 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1170 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2210 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 45 L | 57 L |
