1999 Citroen Xsara vs. 1976 Volvo 66
To start off, 1999 Citroen Xsara is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Volvo 66. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Volvo 66 would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Citroen Xsara (87 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 40 more horse power than 1976 Volvo 66. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 1976 Volvo 66. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 500 kg more than 1976 Volvo 66. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 Volvo 66 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Volvo 66. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Citroen Xsara, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Citroen Xsara | 1976 Volvo 66 | |
| Make | Citroen | Volvo |
| Model | Xsara | 66 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1976 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1997 cc | 1108 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 87 HP | 47 HP |
| Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1320 kg | 820 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3910 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1380 mm | 1390 mm |
