1999 Citroen Xsara vs. 2000 Kia Avella
To start off, 2000 Kia Avella is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 1,527 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Citroen Xsara (90 HP @ 5600 RPM) has 18 more horse power than 2000 Kia Avella. (72 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Citroen Xsara should accelerate faster than 2000 Kia Avella. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 325 kg more than 2000 Kia Avella. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 135 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Citroen Xsara | 2000 Kia Avella | |
| Make | Citroen | Kia |
| Model | Xsara | Avella |
| Year Released | 1999 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 1527 cc | 1322 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 90 HP | 72 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5600 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 135 Nm | 135 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1240 kg | 915 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4280 mm | 3980 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1760 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1640 mm | 1460 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2770 mm | 2400 mm |
