1999 Citroen Xsara vs. 2004 Ford E-250
To start off, 2004 Ford E-250 is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 4,605 cc (8 cylinders), 2004 Ford E-250 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Ford E-250 (225 HP @ 6150 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 1999 Citroen Xsara. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Ford E-250 should accelerate faster than 1999 Citroen Xsara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2004 Ford E-250 weights approximately 1210 kg more than 1999 Citroen Xsara. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2004 Ford E-250 (389 Nm) has 178 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Citroen Xsara. (211 Nm). This means 2004 Ford E-250 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Citroen Xsara.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Citroen Xsara | 2004 Ford E-250 | |
Make | Citroen | Ford |
Model | Xsara | E-250 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2004 |
Body Type | Hatchback | Van |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 1997 cc | 4605 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 89 HP | 225 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 6150 RPM |
Torque | 211 Nm | 389 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 85 mm | 90 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 88 mm | 90 mm |
Number of Seats | 5 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 3 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1160 kg | 2370 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4170 mm | 5900 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1710 mm | 2020 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1410 mm | 2140 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2560 mm | 3510 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11.9 L/100km | 13.8 L/100km |