1999 Citroen Xsara vs. 2005 Toyota RunX

To start off, 2005 Toyota RunX is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Citroen Xsara. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Citroen Xsara would be higher. At 1,997 cc (4 cylinders), 1999 Citroen Xsara is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2005 Toyota RunX (108 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 19 more horse power than 1999 Citroen Xsara. (89 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2005 Toyota RunX should accelerate faster than 1999 Citroen Xsara. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Citroen Xsara weights approximately 26 kg more than 2005 Toyota RunX.

Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Citroen Xsara (211 Nm @ 1900 RPM) has 65 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota RunX. (146 Nm @ 4400 RPM). This means 1999 Citroen Xsara will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota RunX.

Compare all specifications:

1999 Citroen Xsara 2005 Toyota RunX
Make Citroen Toyota
Model Xsara RunX
Year Released 1999 2005
Body Type Hatchback Hatchback
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 1997 cc 1598 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Valves per Cylinder 3 valves 4 valves
Horse Power 89 HP 108 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 6000 RPM
Torque 211 Nm 146 Nm
Torque RPM 1900 RPM 4400 RPM
Engine Bore Size 85 mm 79 mm
Engine Stroke Size 88 mm 81.5 mm
Acceleration 0-100mph 14.9 seconds 10.2 seconds
Drive Type Front Front
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 5 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 3 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 1160 kg 1134 kg
Wheelbase Size 2560 mm 2750 mm
Fuel Consumption Overall 11.9 L/100km 7 L/100km