1999 Daewoo Arcadia vs. 1976 Zastava 132
To start off, 1999 Daewoo Arcadia is newer by 23 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Zastava 132. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Zastava 132 would be higher. At 3,204 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Daewoo Arcadia is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Daewoo Arcadia (202 HP @ 5500 RPM) has 96 more horse power than 1976 Zastava 132. (106 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Daewoo Arcadia should accelerate faster than 1976 Zastava 132. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Daewoo Arcadia weights approximately 495 kg more than 1976 Zastava 132. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1976 Zastava 132 is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1976 Zastava 132. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Daewoo Arcadia, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Daewoo Arcadia | 1976 Zastava 132 | |
| Make | Daewoo | Zastava |
| Model | Arcadia | 132 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1976 |
| Engine Size | 3204 cc | 1756 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 202 HP | 106 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5500 RPM | 6000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1590 kg | 1095 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4960 mm | 4410 mm |
