1999 Daewoo Korando vs. 1952 Triumph Mayflower
To start off, 1999 Daewoo Korando is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Triumph Mayflower. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Triumph Mayflower would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Daewoo Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Daewoo Korando (108 HP) has 71 more horse power than 1952 Triumph Mayflower. (37 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Daewoo Korando should accelerate faster than 1952 Triumph Mayflower. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Daewoo Korando weights approximately 138 kg more than 1952 Triumph Mayflower. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Daewoo Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1952 Triumph Mayflower. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Daewoo Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Daewoo Korando (421 Nm) has 342 more torque (in Nm) than 1952 Triumph Mayflower. (79 Nm). This means 1999 Daewoo Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1952 Triumph Mayflower.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Daewoo Korando | 1952 Triumph Mayflower | |
Make | Daewoo | Triumph |
Model | Korando | Mayflower |
Year Released | 1999 | 1952 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 1247 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 37 HP |
Torque | 421 Nm | 79 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Vehicle Weight | 1088 kg | 950 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 45 L |