1999 Daewoo Korando vs. 2002 Renault Clio
To start off, 2002 Renault Clio is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Daewoo Korando. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Daewoo Korando would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Daewoo Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2002 Renault Clio (252 HP) has 144 more horse power than 1999 Daewoo Korando. (108 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2002 Renault Clio should accelerate faster than 1999 Daewoo Korando. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2002 Renault Clio weights approximately 322 kg more than 1999 Daewoo Korando. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Daewoo Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2002 Renault Clio. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Daewoo Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Daewoo Korando (421 Nm) has 121 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Renault Clio. (300 Nm). This means 1999 Daewoo Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Renault Clio.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Daewoo Korando | 2002 Renault Clio | |
Make | Daewoo | Renault |
Model | Korando | Clio |
Year Released | 1999 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 2946 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 252 HP |
Torque | 421 Nm | 300 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1088 kg | 1410 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 60 L |