1999 Daewoo Korando vs. 2006 Rover 25
To start off, 2006 Rover 25 is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1999 Daewoo Korando. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1999 Daewoo Korando would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 1999 Daewoo Korando is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Daewoo Korando (108 HP) has 25 more horse power than 2006 Rover 25. (83 HP). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Daewoo Korando should accelerate faster than 2006 Rover 25. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Daewoo Korando weights approximately 3 kg more than 2006 Rover 25. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 1999 Daewoo Korando is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2006 Rover 25. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1999 Daewoo Korando will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 1999 Daewoo Korando (421 Nm) has 311 more torque (in Nm) than 2006 Rover 25. (110 Nm). This means 1999 Daewoo Korando will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2006 Rover 25.
Compare all specifications:
1999 Daewoo Korando | 2006 Rover 25 | |
Make | Daewoo | Rover |
Model | Korando | 25 |
Year Released | 1999 | 2006 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 1396 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 108 HP | 83 HP |
Torque | 421 Nm | 110 Nm |
Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 1088 kg | 1085 kg |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 48 L | 50 L |