1999 Daewoo Matiz vs. 1981 Zastava 102
To start off, 1999 Daewoo Matiz is newer by 18 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 102. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 102 would be higher. At 1,299 cc (4 cylinders), 1981 Zastava 102 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1999 Daewoo Matiz (51 HP @ 6000 RPM) has 2 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 102. (49 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 1999 Daewoo Matiz should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 102. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1999 Daewoo Matiz weights approximately 76 kg more than 1981 Zastava 102. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 1981 Zastava 102 (95 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 23 more torque (in Nm) than 1999 Daewoo Matiz. (72 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 1981 Zastava 102 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1999 Daewoo Matiz.
Compare all specifications:
| 1999 Daewoo Matiz | 1981 Zastava 102 | |
| Make | Daewoo | Zastava |
| Model | Matiz | 102 |
| Year Released | 1999 | 1981 |
| Engine Size | 796 cc | 1299 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 3 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 51 HP | 49 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6000 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 72 Nm | 95 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 846 kg | 770 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 3600 mm | 3500 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1500 mm | 1550 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1500 mm | 1340 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2350 mm | 2160 mm |
